WOMEN IN
GOVERNANCE
Feb 2, 2013
Press Release
President urged not to Sign the Ordinance by Women's
Organizations
New Delhi, 2 Feb 2013: We, as representatives of women’s
organizations, civil society groups, and activists committed to women’s rights,
convey our strong opposition to the Government's decision to move an Ordinance
on the criminal law amendments related to sexual violence. We call
upon the President of India to not sign such an Ordinance.
Information in the public domain,
through media sources, reveals that an Ordinance on amendments to sexual
assault law was cleared by the Cabinet yesterday, on February 1, 2013 - about
20 days before the next parliamentary session. We are alarmed at the
complete lack of transparency displayed by the Government in proposing an
Ordinance as an emergency measure. We wonder what objective and
purpose will be served by such a hasty non-transparent measure - less than 3
weeks before the parliamentary session, since the proposed law will not
retrospectively apply to the Delhi gang rape case.
We demand transparency and due
process in law making. We demand that the Parliamentary process, including
the Standing Committee process be upheld, for this is the place where we,
as citizens of this country, have the right to be heard.
"An Ordinance like this,
implemented by stealth, only serves to weaken our democracy" notes Vrinda
Grover, a human rights lawyer. Emphasizing this concern, Madhu Mehra, a
women’s rights lawyer added ,"An Ordinance like this betrays the trust of
scores of Indian men and women, who marched the streets of Delhi and other
cities demanding an end to impunity for Sexual Violence.".
Women's
Organizations are shocked further shocked to learn that the JVC report
has not been considered fully or even partially, neither in letter nor in
spirit in the content of this Ordinance.
"We
are told that virtually all the recommendations that we and others had
hailed as signs of a paradigm shift in understanding violence against women; all
the recommendations that can actually strike at the heart of impunity - have
been dropped" stated activists, Kavita Krishnan, Farah Naqvi and Sunita
Dhar.
It
was pointed out that these include - recognition in law of marital
rape, new provisions on the offence of breach of command responsibility,
non-requirement of sanction for prosecuting a member of the security forces
accused of sexual assault and rape, provision for trying them under ordinary
criminal law for sexual crimes; and change in definition of consent to any
sexual act.
Furthermore,
the content of the Ordinance to our knowledge has introduced provisions that
were strongly rejected by the Justice Verma Committee, including the
death penalty. "We are shocked to learn that the Ordinance introduces a
gender neutral perpetrator for sexual assault, suggesting that both women and
men could potentially be charged for the offence. Rape as we know it is a crime
largely defined as male violence against women, with absolutely no evidence of
women as perpetrators. This is in disregard of the Justice Verma
recommendations too, and is totally unacceptable", noted Madhu Mehra.
This sudden and shocking ordinance by the UPA
government has defeated democracy once again. Policy framing in our country has
failed to address the needs of most marginalized women, including
Dalit-Adivasi, Muslim women and
those victimized by armed forces. We condemn this manner of concealed and
secretive process which completely disregards all the protests and inputs provided
by women's organisations across the country, said by Asha Kowtal, Women Dalits
Right Activist.
Government in one hand is talking of
increasing the punishment for rape and on the other hand this ordinance is
completely silent on the recommendation related to AFSPA. Why is the double
standard for the women of Northeast India and Kashmir? Is there an end to
impunity? Stated by Bondita Acharya, Women Activist
from Assam.
Verma Committee recommendations were framed
after elaborate consultations. Public opinion must be respected in law making.
Women’s dignity is a matter of human rights. This right should not be deprived
at any circumstances. Government must frame laws according to the
recommendations. If committee’s recommendations are not be accepted, then why
spending public money in constituting such a body, noted Anjuman Ara Begum,
Human Rights Activist from Assam.
Women's groups have been demanding
comprehensive amendments in criminal law related to sexual violence for over
two decades, and have expressed our endorsement of the Justice Verma Committee
Report. We have made oral and written submissions to the Justice Verma
Committee and our voices and concerns were reflected in the Committee's report.
"We again reiterate our call to the Government of India to implement
the recommendations of the report comprehensively, in letter and spirit"
noted Vrinda Grover. We congratulate the Justice Verma Committee for completing
the report in record time without compromising on consultations, dialogue, due
process and transparency.
"Even as we have called upon the Government of India to implement the Committee’s report with alacrity, we emphasise that such implementation not be at the cost of due process, or selective adoption of the Committee's recommendations" stated Farah Naqvi.
-------------------------------------
For more details please contact:
Anjuman: 9954082155,
Asha:09560100442 and Bondita: 9864323337
Comments
Post a Comment