Human rights day

December 10: International Human Rights Day

By Anjuman Ara Begum, TwoCircles.net,
Guwahati: It has been 62 years since the Universal Declaration of Human Rights came into effect. The Magna Carta of human rights declares and urges all states to ensure respect for human rights and human dignity. The declaration came into force on December 10, 1948, is considered ‘the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world’. Though the declaration is not a formal treaty, its significance is so widely accepted that today no country can deny its relevance and contribution to the human rights norms.
In 1950, all States and interested organizations were invited by the United Nations General Assembly to observe 10 December as Human Rights Day. The UN also adopted a resolution – 423(V) – to mark the anniversary of the Assembly's adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. Thus a significant day was born. And now, states, interested organizations and individuals observe this day with different programmes aiming to raise awareness about the protection and promotion of human rights all over the world.
It would be interesting to know that the term ‘human rights’ though a common terminology, is a recent phenomenon. In ancient texts and other writing ‘human rights’ was never used. Religious commands contained human rights elements which can be treated as early ‘natural rights’. Religious commands like ‘thou shall not steal’, ‘love thy neighbour’, ‘atithi devo bhava’, etc are important elements of human rights. The Roman concept of Jus gentium- those rules which Romans discovered to be common to all civilized societies - can be cited as another example.
The Church as an institution dominated the natural rights discourse in the middle ages. Concepts like ‘divine rights of the kings’ or kings represent God dominated the discourse. The Magna Carta is hailed as the first document that codified the elements of modern day human rights. The Magna Carta signed in 1215 contained certain terms that limited the power of the state like “no man will we sell, to no man will we deny justice”. Wikipedia informs that it was also the first document forced onto an English King by a group of his subjects (the barons) in an attempt to limit his powers by law and protect their privileges.
The Glorious Revolution, 1688 also called the Revolution of 1688, was the overthrow of King James II of England. The declaration resulting from the revolution called the Declaration of Rights, 1688, is characterized by the first appearance of the term ‘rights’ and it ended the King’s claim to absolute rule by Divine Right and imposed upon him accountability to the Parliament.
The French Declaration of 1789 contains a detailed description of ‘natural, inalienable, sacred rights of man’ like presumption of innocence and legal process for arrest and detention. The United States Constitution adopted in 1789 for the first time contained a detailed codified human rights chapter called the ‘Bill of Rights’ that guarantees habeas corpus, fair trial and due process of law. The French Declaration and the American Constitution’s Bill of Rights became the present day model for human rights guarantees at national and international levels.
It was the United Nations Organisation that came into being in 1945, which coined the term ‘human rights’. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and several other human rights declarations, guiding principles, resolutions and covenants etc form the human rights documents and norms.
There are also regional human rights standards developed in the last century.
Human rights in India
The Constitution of India guarantees a wide range of human rights under the Part III of the Constitution. The presence of vibrant media and activist judiciary has done a commendable job in upholding the spirit of the human rights. But still the human rights situation in India remains grim since independence and is a growing concern for the civil society. Torture and ill-treatment, custodial deaths, extra-judicial executions and forced and involuntary disappearances remain a concern for people advocating human rights in India. Armed groups also commit grave human rights abuses, including killings, tortures and rapes, with impunity.
With reference to the human rights violations in north east India especially under the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, several observations were communicated to the Government of India by the international human rights bodies. Some of these observations are given below.
Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination observed (CERD/C/IND/CO/19) on 5 May 2007:
“The Committee notes with concern that the State party [India] has not implemented the recommendations of the Committee to Review the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (1958) to repeal the Act, under which members of the armed forces may not be prosecuted unless such prosecution is authorized by the Central Government and have wide powers to search and arrest suspects without a warrant or to use force against persons or property in Manipur and other north-eastern States which are inhabited by tribal peoples (arts. 2 (1) (c), 5 (b), (d) and 6).”
The Committee urges the State party to repeal the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act and to replace it “by a more humane Act,” in accordance with the recommendations contained in the 2005 report of the above Review Committee set up by the Ministry of Home Affairs. It also requests the State party to release the report.
Committee on Elimination of All forms of Discrimination Against Women, CEDAW observed in 2007:
“The Committee is concerned that the State party has not taken adequate steps to implement the recommendations in regard to some concerns raised in the Committee’s previous concluding comments adopted in 2000.” (See Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-fifth Session, Supplement No. 38 (A/55/38). The Committee reiterates the concerns and recommendations in the concluding comments adopted in 2000 and urges the State party to proceed without delay with their implementation. The Committee requests the State party to provide information on the steps being taken to abolish or reform the Armed Forces Special Powers Act and to ensure that investigation and prosecution of acts of violence against women by the military in disturbed areas and during detention or arrest is not impeded.
Human Rights Committee or HRC observed in 1997:
“The Committee regrets that some parts of India have remained subject to declaration as disturbed areas over many years - for example the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act has been applied throughout Manipur since 1980 and in some areas of that state for much longer - and that, in these areas, the State party is in effect using emergency powers without resorting to article 4, paragraph 3, of the Covenant. Therefore: the Committee recommends that the application of these emergency powers be closely monitored so as to ensure its strict compliance with the provisions of the Covenant.”
Being the largest democracy in the world and as a growing influential country in the world India needs to be more concerned about the human rights issues and foster a culture of human rights through protection and promotion of the same along with the rule of law not only in the country but the world over.
[Photo by http://passiontounderstand.blogspot.com]

Comment viewing options

 
 
 
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The manipulation of Justice System in India

The manipulation of Justice System in India
I do not know what for I was singled out?
Kiranjot Kaur said, “Self-respect vs Security rules.............why shouldn't Ambassadors be subject to same treatment as us.......ordinary law-abiding citizens??”
Whether monopoly of Self-respect, Professional ethics, Security rules, I never understood being a quite experienced Advocate so far, what is it and what is prevailing in India? But, definitely there is no same treatment, even staying in the same profession here in India.
Once I was singled out as an Advocate for a search before entering in Burail Jail in the month of October-November 1996, then one of my learned friends cautioned friendly to the superintendent of the Jail, Mr. Sharma, saying there shall be news of this search! Mr. Sharma advanced quickly towards me saying as to why I can’t meet Advocate Sooch closely as he came from far away i.e. Ludhiana and searched me without admitting it as a search and without bringing it on record. I did protest smilingly and did suggest for bringing it on record so that all should know that advocates are also not being trusted in India now, the way I was searched. The superintendent of the Jail, Mr. Sharma smiled and ignored my suggestion in the presence of my learned friends and the Jail staff.
On the next date of hearing in the case concerned, I came to know that the treatment of search by singling me out was a manipulated humiliation to shunt me out and also pressurized the accused for the purpose.
http://www.sikhvicharmanch.com/Punjabi/General-Model%20Jail%20Chandigarh...
ਮਾਡਲ ਜੇਲ੍ਹ ਚੰਡੀਗੜ੍ਹ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਸ਼ਾਸਨ ਨਾਲ ਖੱਟਾ-ਮਿੱਠਾ ਤਜਰਬਾ
ਬਲਬੀਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਸੂਚ, ਐਡਵੋਕੇਟ, ਲੁਧਿਆਣਾ
ਇਹ ਕਿ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੇ ਵਕਾਲਤ ਦੇ ਪੇਸ਼ੇ ਨਾਲ ਜੁੜੇ ਸਬੰਧਤ ਸਾਥੀਆਂ ਦੇ ਪਿਛੋਕੜ ਦੇ ਨਿੱਜੀ ਵਰਤਾਰੇ ਬਾਰੇ ਵੀ ਪ੍ਰਤੱਖ ਸਮਝ ਤੇ ਸਾਰਾ ਕੁੱਝ ਯਾਦ ਸੀ। ਸਾਥੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਪਤਾ ਸੀ ਕਿ ਜੇਕਰ ਇਹ ਇਸ ਕੇਸ `ਚ ਵੀ ਆਉਂਦਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਤਾਂ ਇਹ ਗੈਰ-ਪੇਸ਼ਾਵਰ ਹਰਕਤਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਵਾਂਗ ਹੀਰਿਕਾਰਡ `ਤੇ ਲਿਆ ਦੇਵੇਗਾ। ਇਸੇ ਕਾਰਨ ਹੀ ਮੈਂ ਕਥਿਤ ਦੋਸ਼ੀਆਂ ਦੀ ਰਾਏ ਨਾਲ ਹੀ ਲੱਗੇਵਕਾਲਤਨਾਮੇ ਦੇ ਬਾਵਜੂਦ ਆਉਣੋ ਬੰਦ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਸੀ।
ਦੂਸਰੇ ਵਕੀਲ ਸਾਥੀਆਂ ਦੀ ਸਹਿਮਤੀ ਲੈਣ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ, ਭਾਈ ਕੰਵਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਧਾਮੀ ਦੇ ਕਹਿਣ ਤੇਲਿਖਾਉਣ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਉਸ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਕੇਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਜ਼ੇਰੇ ਧਾਰਾ 313 ਸੀ ਆਰ ਪੀ ਸੀ (CrPC) ਅਧੀਨ ਲਿਖਤੀ ਬਿਆਨ ਪੇਸ਼ ਕੀਤੇ ਤੇ ਜੋ ਡਰਾਮਾ ਇਹ ਬਿਆਨ ਮਿਸਲ `ਤੇ ਸ਼ਾਮਲ ਕਰਨ ਸਮੇਂਹੋਇਆ! ਕਿਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਉਸ ਸਮੇਂ ਅਦਾਲਤ ਦਾ ਵਤੀਰਾ ਸੀ? ਕਿਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਸਾਥੀ ਵਕੀਲ ਆਪਣੀ ਪਹਿਲੋਂ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਸਹਿਮਤੀ ਦੇ ਬਾਵਜੂਦ ਇਸ ਲੇਖਕ ਵੱਲੋ ਜ਼ੇਰੇ ਧਾਰਾ 313 ਸੀ ਆਰ ਪੀ ਸੀ (CrPC ) ਅਧੀਨ ਲਿਖਤੀ ਬਿਆਨ ਮਿਸਲ `ਤੇ ਲਾਉਣ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਫਲ ਹੋਣ ਤਕ ਤੇ ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੇਠੀ ਮਹਿਸੂਸ ਕਰ ਰਹੇ ਸਨ? ਜਿੱਥੇ ਉਹ ਲਿਖਤੀ ਬਿਆਨ ਸਿੱਖਾਂ ਲਈ ਬਤੌਰ ਇੱਕ‘ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ’ ਮਿਸਲ `ਤੇ ਬਣਿਆ ਰਹੇਗਾ ਉੱਥੇ ਉਹ ਸਮਾਂ ਮੈਨੂੰ, ਭਾਈ ਕੰਵਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਧਾਮੀ, ਬੀਬੀ ਕੁਲਬੀਰ ਕੌਰ ਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਹਾਜਰ ਅਦਾਲਤ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਲਈ ਅਭੁੱਲ ਯਾਦ ਬਣੀ ਰਹੇਗੀ। ਉਹ 'ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ' ਪੂਰੀ ਪ੍ਰੈਸ ਨੂੰ ਵੀ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਤੇ ਭੇਜਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਸੀ। ਉਸ'ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ' ਦਾ ਕੁੱਝ ਹਿੱਸਾ ਪੂਰੇ ਵੇਰਵੇ ਨਾਲ ਸਟੋਰੀ ਦੀ ਸ਼ਕਲ `ਚ ਅੰਗਰੇਜੀ ਦੇ ਅਖਬਾਰ ‘ਦੀ ਟ੍ਰਿਬਿਊਨ’ ਚੰਡੀਗੜ੍ਹ ਵਿੱਚ ਛਪਿਆ ਵੀ ਸੀ।
ਭਾਈ ਕੰਵਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਧਾਮੀ ਤੇ ਬੀਬੀ ਕੁਲਬੀਰ ਕੌਰ ਵੱਲੋਂ ‘ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕ ਦਸਤਾਵੇਜ’ ਮੇਰੇ ਰਾਹੀਂਪੇਸ਼ ਕੀਤੇ ਜਾਣ ਸਮੇਂ ਦ੍ਰਿਸ਼ ਗੰਭੀਰ ਤੇ ਮਾਨਯੋਗ ਅਦਾਲਤ ਦਾ ਸਾਥੀ ਵਕੀਲ ਨਾਲ ਮਿਲ ਕੇ,ਕੀਤੇ ਜਾ ਰਹੇ ਵਤੀਰੇ ਦਾ ਕੌੜਾ ਤਜਰਬਾ, ਹੁਣ ਦੇ ਮਾਡਲ ਜੇਲ੍ਹ ਚੰਡੀਗੜ੍ਹ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਸ਼ਾਸਨ ਤੋਂ ਮਿਲੇ ਖੱਟੇ-ਮਿਠੇ ਤਜਰਬੇ ਨਾਲੋਂ ਭਿੰਨ ਸੀ। ਉਸ ਵੇਲੇ ਅਦਾਲਤ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਸੋਚ ਸਮਝ ਕੇ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਭੜਕਾਹਟ ਵਿੱਚ ਲਿਆਉਣ ਦਾ ਯਤਨ ਵੀ ਹੋਰ ਸੀ। ਉਸ ਵੇਲੇ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਭੜਕਾਹਟ `ਚ ਲਿਆ ਕੇ ‘ਕੋਰਟ ਦੀ ਤੌਹੀਨ ਕਰਨ’ (Contempt of Court) ਦਾ ਦੋਸ਼ ਲਾ ਕੇ ਹਮੇਸ਼ਾ ਲਈ ਦਾਗੀ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਮਨਸ਼ਾ ਸੀ।
Such treatments were not isolated cases in my life so far.
Ludhiana Police Commissioner orders inquiry into collection of Goonda Tax by Punjab Police
http://www.sikhvicharmanch.com/Current%20Issue-Ludhiana%20Police%20Commi...
Airport search angers Indian diplomat
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/12/09/Airport-search-angers-Indian-d...
India Protests Pat-down Of Ambassador To US
http://www.rttnews.com/Content/GeneralNews.aspx?Node=B1&Id=1502554
Meera Shankar’s ‘Pat Down’ Search in US “Unacceptable”, Says Krishna
http://www.indiamag.in/meera-shankars-pat-down-search-in-us-unacceptable...
Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana
Chief and Spokesperson, Sikh Vichar Manch
December 10, 2010
http://www.sikhvicharmanch.com/
http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.php?id=100000753376567
Coward
ਬੁਜ਼ਦਿਲ
ਬੁਜ਼ਦਿਲ! ਭੱਜਿਆ ਹੀ ਭੱਜਿਆ
ਨਾ ਵਪਾਰ ਸਿੱਖਿਆ ਨਾ ਬਣਿਆ ਵਪਾਰੀ
ਹੱਕਾਂ ਦੀ ਰਾਖੀ ਦੇ ਨਾਂ ਨਾਲ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਵਪਾਰ ਦੇਖਿਆ
ਵਪਾਰੀ ਹੀ ਵਪਾਰੀ ਮਿਲੇ !
ਕਾਹਦੇ?
ਇਨਸਾਨੀ ਘਾਣ ਤੇ ਲਹੂ ਦੇ ਵਪਾਰੀ
ਫਿਰ ਕੀ ਹੋਇਆ?
ਆਪਣੇ ਹੀ ਹੱਕਾਂ ਦੀ ਰਾਖੀ ਲਈ ਭੱਜਿਆ
ਕਿਤੇ ਰੁਕਿਆ ਵੀ!
ਨਹੀਂ! ਭੱਜਿਆ ਹੀ ਭੱਜਿਆ
ਵੱਸ! ਬਹੁਤਾ ਨਾ ਪੁੱਛ
ਸੂਚ! ਇਹੀ ਹੈ ਨਾ ਤੇਰੀ ਜੀਵਨ ਕਹਾਣੀ
ਭੱਜਿਆ ਹੀ ਭੱਜਿਆ
ਬੁਜ਼ਦਿਲ!
ਬਲਬੀਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਸੂਚ, ਐਡਵੋਕੇਟ, ਲੁਧਿਆਣਾ-ਸਿੱਖ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਮੰਚ
www.sikhvicharmanch.com, Email: svmanch@gmail.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ima market of Imphal

On Citizenship Rights in Assam

When memories haunt