Ima market of Imphal

 WOMEN IN GOVERNANCE

 Feb 2, 2013

Press Release

President urged not to Sign the Ordinance by Women's Organizations

New Delhi, 2 Feb 2013:  We, as representatives of women’s organizations, civil society groups, and activists committed to women’s rights, convey our strong opposition to the Government's decision to move an Ordinance on the criminal law amendments related to sexual violence. We call upon the President of India to not sign such an Ordinance.    

Information in the public domain, through media sources, reveals that an Ordinance on amendments to sexual assault law was cleared by the Cabinet yesterday, on February 1, 2013 - about 20 days before the next parliamentary session. We are alarmed at the complete lack of transparency displayed by the Government in proposing an Ordinance as an emergency measure.  We wonder what objective and purpose will be served by such a hasty non-transparent measure - less than 3 weeks before the parliamentary session, since the proposed law will not retrospectively apply to the Delhi gang rape case.  

         

We demand transparency and due process in law making. We demand that the Parliamentary process, including the Standing Committee process be upheld, for this is the place where we, as citizens of this country, have the right to be heard.

"An Ordinance like this, implemented by stealth, only serves to weaken our democracy" notes Vrinda Grover, a human rights lawyer. Emphasizing this concern, Madhu Mehra, a women’s rights lawyer added ,"An Ordinance like this betrays the trust of scores of Indian men and women, who marched the streets of Delhi and other cities demanding an end to impunity for Sexual Violence.".  

Women's Organizations are shocked further shocked to learn that the JVC report has not been considered fully or even partially, neither in letter nor in spirit in the content of this Ordinance.

"We are told that virtually all the recommendations that we and others had hailed as signs of a paradigm shift in understanding violence against women; all the recommendations that can actually strike at the heart of impunity - have been dropped" stated activists, Kavita Krishnan, Farah Naqvi and Sunita Dhar.  

It was pointed out that these include - recognition in law of marital rape, new provisions on the offence of breach of command responsibility, non-requirement of sanction for prosecuting a member of the security forces accused of sexual assault and rape, provision for trying them under ordinary criminal law for sexual crimes; and change in definition of consent to any sexual act. 

Furthermore, the content of the Ordinance to our knowledge has introduced provisions that were strongly rejected by the Justice Verma Committee, including the death penalty. "We are shocked to learn that the Ordinance introduces a gender neutral perpetrator for sexual assault, suggesting that both women and men could potentially be charged for the offence. Rape as we know it is a crime largely defined as male violence against women, with absolutely no evidence of women as perpetrators. This is in disregard of the Justice Verma recommendations too, and is totally unacceptable", noted Madhu Mehra.

This sudden and shocking ordinance by the UPA government has defeated democracy once again. Policy framing in our country has failed to address the needs of most marginalized women, including Dalit-Adivasi, Muslim women and those victimized by armed forces. We condemn this manner of concealed and secretive process which completely disregards all the protests and inputs provided by women's organisations across the country, said by Asha Kowtal, Women Dalits Right Activist.

Government in one hand is talking of increasing the punishment for rape and on the other hand this ordinance is completely silent on the recommendation related to AFSPA. Why is the double standard for the women of Northeast India and Kashmir? Is there an end to impunity? Stated by Bondita Acharya, Women Activist from Assam.    

Verma Committee recommendations were framed after elaborate consultations. Public opinion must be respected in law making. Women’s dignity is a matter of human rights. This right should not be deprived at any circumstances. Government must frame laws according to the recommendations. If committee’s recommendations are not be accepted, then why spending public money in constituting such a body, noted Anjuman Ara Begum, Human Rights Activist from Assam.

Women's groups have been demanding comprehensive amendments in criminal law related to sexual violence for over two decades, and have expressed our endorsement of the Justice Verma Committee Report. We have made oral and written submissions to the Justice Verma Committee and our voices and concerns were reflected in the Committee's report. "We again reiterate our call to the Government of India to implement the recommendations of the report comprehensively, in letter and spirit" noted Vrinda Grover. We congratulate the Justice Verma Committee for completing the report in record time without compromising on consultations, dialogue, due process and transparency.

"Even as we have called upon the Government of India to implement the Committee’s report with alacrity, we emphasise that such implementation not be at the cost of due process, or selective adoption of the Committee's recommendations" stated Farah Naqvi.  

         

-------------------------------------

For more details please contact:

Anjuman: 9954082155, Asha:09560100442 and Bondita: 9864323337